In
April, Maryland passed the first bill ever to disable employers from being able
to ask job applicants or employees their social media passwords. This is
important because beforehand, employers were technically able to ask the
current employees or job applicants for their passwords. This violated the
applicants and employees right of privacy on the social networks, but if they
were unwilling to do it they might be faced with consequences.
Imagine if
you were faced with the request of providing your Facebook or Twitter
passwords. How would you feel regarding the privacy of your pictures, wall
posts, tweets and more? How would you feel about your family and friends being
accessed by your employers? This would invade their privacy as well without
their consent. All of these factors bring about an even bigger question: Does
the perception you portray online matter if the presence at your job is
outstanding?
Should it matter that you have pictures of drinking alcohol or partying on the
weekends if when you come to work Monday through Friday as a
professional. Does your language and character being portrayed on these
social media sites matter if your performance at your job is more than
adequate? In my opinion, it should not matter. The way I am being portrayed
online in a private setting should not matter if I am a great employee. It is
not right for employees to search through my private information just to find
something they don't like. The purpose of being an employee is to do well at
your job. If I am doing just that, there is absolutely no reason to dig through
my private life. After all, I do have a right of privacy from my job.
This all ties into a law that is being proposed from the Obama Administration,
focusing on “Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights” that relates to online users
data. It stems from the incident of Google tracking users' location, thus
violating their privacy. The bill focuses on providing a sense of trust between
the consumers and the businesses, because without it the consumers are very
skeptical of the possible use of their private information. The
"Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights" has six sections: transparency,
respect for context, security, access and accuracy, focused collection, and
accountability. These are all important areas that focus on users use of
private information. The two most important areas involve making sure
personal data is handled in the correct way and that it is safe.
It is
important that businesses that deal with private user information have laws and
restrictions. It is even more important that these users understand that there are
laws and restrictions that give them rights over their own privacy. This not only
provides a sense of understanding of rights for the users, but also reassurance
that their private information is legally in good hands. There are many issues
involving privacy and the Internet. It is important that users of the Internet
have protection by laws and restrictions so that their information does not get
abused.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis infringes on privacy rights. I should be able to put something on Facebook or Twitter without having to worry about people seeing it that I don’t want to see it. With the media and technology evolving so quickly, when instances like this come up where people are questioning the legality and morality of something, we need to make sure to make clear rules right away. If we try to change something after it has been around for a while, the change will only become harder and less popular. I understand that the Internet has some good restrictions there for a reason, but in the long run, it is going to be better to decide now and create laws like the Bill you discussed then it would be to address these issues later.
ReplyDelete